Decipher your archive
Transcribe difficult handwriting instantly and turn your unwieldy manuscripts into an organized, searchable digital library
How it works
“The transcription quality is outstanding—far superior to other tools I’ve used, including Transkribus. It handled complex manuscript material with remarkable accuracy. I was genuinely astonished by how well it performed on sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English manuscripts, Latin texts, and even Law French.”
Olav Sigmundstad
PhD Student in History, University of Cambridge
Enhance your workflow with Leo
Accelerate your research with Leo’s unique, all-in-one transcription and document management platform
AI-powered transcription
Leo's AI-powered transcription system is ready to use right out of the box, preserving strikethroughs, additions, margin notes, and tables
Unique, state-of-the-art model for historical handwriting
Instant results with no model training required
Flexibility to use other models, including GPT, Gemini, and Claude
Seamless organization
Keep all your primary sources in one place, categorized, and easy to find with Leo's intuitive file structure, advanced search and metadata filtering capabilities
Organise your collection into custom folders
Search across all your transcriptions and notes
Export documents as XML, Word, or PDF
Advanced analysis
Use our advanced AI tools to generate sophisticated, research-ready insights across your entire collection at the click of a button
Rapidly correct, modernise, and translate text
Automatically create summaries, glossaries, and extract named entities
Interpolate results from multiple models
Share your collection
Share your documents with friends, colleagues, and students to add to their own collections or access even if they don't have a Leo account
Distribute primary sources without technical barriers
Share your documents via secure public links
Allow other users to copy documents to their own collections
“I would very much recommend this to both my students and colleagues. It's a game changer for archival research that can save us so much time.”
Jason Glenn
Associate Professor of History, University of Southern California
Pricing
Versatile pricing for every project
Free
$0
Storage: 100 images
Monthly credits: 10
Standard
Popular
$15
/month
Storage: 10,000 images
Monthly credits: 100
Scholar
$65
/month
Storage: 50,000 images
Monthly credits: 500
Professional
$120
/month
Storage: 100,000 images
Monthly credits: 1,000
Additional lifetime credits
The credits attached to the subscription options last until the end of every monthly billing cycle. Users with additional needs can purchase extra lifetime credits which never expire.
100 credits
$20
500 credits
$80
1,000 credits
$150
What our users say
“Leo is a game changer for a large data project—it promises to speed up exponentially the process of moving all the documents to a digital humanities project where all transcribed documents will go through XML markup and connect to a growing relational database. The bottleneck is no longer transcription.”
Kirt von Daacke
Professor of History, University of Virginia
“Leo is an incredibly impressive programme, one that, for my specific sources, performs at a level I previously did not think was possible. My sincere congratulations for developing something that could genuinely become a game changer for how we interact with historical documents!”
Michaela Kalcher
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Reading is what? Fundamental! Leo was so clearly made by historians who know what our very technical and material needs are. The Dropbox-like interface to organize documents, as well as the original image side-by-side the transcription textbox are logical design choices that make for a comfortable user experience. This layout allowed me to easily read the transcriptions alongside original documents, which also taught me to work through the paleographic elements of my archival sources more efficiently.”
Beshouy Botros
PhD Candidate in History, Yale University
“Overall, I found using Leo very easy. As someone without much experience using transcription software (or software of any kind - even Zotero was too awkward for me!) I found Leo extremely user friendly. It coped well with illegible handwriting, ink stains and strikeouts within the text which made the experience much easier.”
Ailsa Maxwell
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Leo has been an exceptionally helpful and user-friendly tool, and it has already made a meaningful difference in the speed, accuracy, and organization of my archival research. What I liked most is how intuitive the interface is and how well Leo handles handwritten historical documents across multiple languages. The platform preserves formatting, reads difficult or low-quality scans surprisingly well, and makes large-scale transcription projects far more manageable than any other tool I’ve used.”
Danielle Wirsansky
PhD Candidate in History, Florida State University
“Leo is a game changer for a large data project—it promises to speed up exponentially the process of moving all the documents to a digital humanities project where all transcribed documents will go through XML markup and connect to a growing relational database. The bottleneck is no longer transcription.”
Kirt von Daacke
Professor of History, University of Virginia
“Leo is an incredibly impressive programme, one that, for my specific sources, performs at a level I previously did not think was possible. My sincere congratulations for developing something that could genuinely become a game changer for how we interact with historical documents!”
Michaela Kalcher
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Reading is what? Fundamental! Leo was so clearly made by historians who know what our very technical and material needs are. The Dropbox-like interface to organize documents, as well as the original image side-by-side the transcription textbox are logical design choices that make for a comfortable user experience. This layout allowed me to easily read the transcriptions alongside original documents, which also taught me to work through the paleographic elements of my archival sources more efficiently.”
Beshouy Botros
PhD Candidate in History, Yale University
“Overall, I found using Leo very easy. As someone without much experience using transcription software (or software of any kind - even Zotero was too awkward for me!) I found Leo extremely user friendly. It coped well with illegible handwriting, ink stains and strikeouts within the text which made the experience much easier.”
Ailsa Maxwell
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Leo has been an exceptionally helpful and user-friendly tool, and it has already made a meaningful difference in the speed, accuracy, and organization of my archival research. What I liked most is how intuitive the interface is and how well Leo handles handwritten historical documents across multiple languages. The platform preserves formatting, reads difficult or low-quality scans surprisingly well, and makes large-scale transcription projects far more manageable than any other tool I’ve used.”
Danielle Wirsansky
PhD Candidate in History, Florida State University
“Leo is a game changer for a large data project—it promises to speed up exponentially the process of moving all the documents to a digital humanities project where all transcribed documents will go through XML markup and connect to a growing relational database. The bottleneck is no longer transcription.”
Kirt von Daacke
Professor of History, University of Virginia
“Leo is an incredibly impressive programme, one that, for my specific sources, performs at a level I previously did not think was possible. My sincere congratulations for developing something that could genuinely become a game changer for how we interact with historical documents!”
Michaela Kalcher
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Reading is what? Fundamental! Leo was so clearly made by historians who know what our very technical and material needs are. The Dropbox-like interface to organize documents, as well as the original image side-by-side the transcription textbox are logical design choices that make for a comfortable user experience. This layout allowed me to easily read the transcriptions alongside original documents, which also taught me to work through the paleographic elements of my archival sources more efficiently.”
Beshouy Botros
PhD Candidate in History, Yale University
“Overall, I found using Leo very easy. As someone without much experience using transcription software (or software of any kind - even Zotero was too awkward for me!) I found Leo extremely user friendly. It coped well with illegible handwriting, ink stains and strikeouts within the text which made the experience much easier.”
Ailsa Maxwell
DPhil Candidate in History, University of Oxford
“Leo has been an exceptionally helpful and user-friendly tool, and it has already made a meaningful difference in the speed, accuracy, and organization of my archival research. What I liked most is how intuitive the interface is and how well Leo handles handwritten historical documents across multiple languages. The platform preserves formatting, reads difficult or low-quality scans surprisingly well, and makes large-scale transcription projects far more manageable than any other tool I’ve used.”
Danielle Wirsansky
PhD Candidate in History, Florida State University
FAQs
If you have a question that isn't answered here, join our community or get in touch directly by pressing the button below and we'll be happy to help
Decipher your archive with Leo
Join the professional historians, archivists, and family researchers using Leo to supercharge their manuscript workflow
© 2026 Leo Technologies Limited. All rights reserved